Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Just "The Evolution of Mindfulness"


Throughout the history of the Church, the Holy Spirit has blown fresh breezes of renewal and reform. For instance, there were many attempts to seek purity and renewal through monasticism and through various efforts to reform the whole church. Some of these attempts gained a measure of success, but others failed miserably. Why, finally, did efforts at reform become Reformation with a capital “R”? Why did a certain monk and university professor and priest named Martin Luther blow breezes of reform that become a whirl wind, when previous efforts could barely move a single leaf on the tree of Christendom? That is why the reformation of the 16th century was based on Jesus Christ alone as the rightful head of his Church and the Center of Christianity and must always be acknowledged, worshiped and followed as such; any ongoing Reformation of the church in my obedience must be focused on Christ alone as Savior and Lord.

“Others have attacked the pop’s morals,” said Martin Luther, “I have attacked his doctrine.” It is not difficult to find examples of misbehavior in the life of the church throughout its history, from the Book of Acts to past articles in the newspapers. Because we humans are sinners, it is obvious that moral vigilance is constantly needed. But the reformation of the sixteenth century was aimed at a deeper level, at the central doctrine of the faith. Doctrine is deeper than behavior? Yes, when doctrine is understood as describing our relationship with God. Crucial though human behavior is, God comes first, and doctrine tells about God and his will and actions. At the center of the reformation is the doctrine of Justification by faith. Any other factor is only secondary compared to this because justification by faith has to do with Jesus Christ and what he has done for us and everything else is subservient to him!

Doctrine is not dry. That’s why when Luther discovered in the scriptures that we are made right with God only through the loving forgiveness of God at the cross; it was a “born-again experience” for him. Luther was a professor of Biblical Theology at the time. Here’s how the professor put it, in his own words: “Night and day I pondered the Bible, especially Romans 1:16-17, until I saw the connection between the justice of God and the statement that ‘the just shall live by faith.’ Then I grasped that the justice of God is theta righteousness by which through grace and sheer mercy God justifies us through faith…Thereupon I felt myself to be reborn and to have gone through open doors into paradise. The whole of Scripture took on a new meaning” and even after reading that,” I sometimes would ask myself Why, I may not know till I die then in eternity you can explain it to me.”

Events happened rapidly a few years later. In 1517, Luther posted “95 Theses” on the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany, protesting the abuse of papal authority and the selling of indulgences (designed to release time of punishment in “Purgatory,” as the Church now taught) Luther’s theses were based on scripture’s revelation of the role of Christ in making sinners right with God by grace through faith. After various hearings and debates, he was excommunicated from the Roman Catholic Church in December 1520. Luther did not want to found a new church. But one was soon to begin, especially after Luther risked his life in taking a bold stand at the Diet (convocation) at Worms, Germany, in 1521, when he refused to take back what he had written. Many doctrinal implications resulted from Luther’s central scriptural discovery. Although originally intended as a teaching movement within the Catholic Church, eventually the “Protestant” wing of Christianity took on an identity of its own, with the following at the center of its theology: justification by grace alone (God’s love, not our goodness) through faith alone (not works), with Scripture alone (not popes or councils) as supreme authority, exalting Christ alone as Lord and Savior. Instead of a hierarchy of priests dispensing merit through a complex system of seven sacraments, only the two sacraments actually commanded by Christ (Baptism and Communion) were retained as free gifts of God’s grace (although confession came close to this status). Also, the “priesthood of all believers” means that all Christians (not just clergy) are priests in the sense of helping one’s neighbor to receive God’s grace in Christ, and bringing God’s forgiving word to the world. In addition, the daily vocations of all Church members really matter to God not just those of priests, monks, and other “religious types.”

Church and state were not often totally separated as the Reformation spread. Luther taught that there are “two kingdoms,” which means that God works in both civil rule and Church and Christians are to do so also. Influential princes aided his Reformation immensely. John Calvin, who became the theological father of Presbyterianism and the “Reformed” churches, felt that the Church should dominate the state; for a time Calvin himself was ruler of Geneva, Switzerland. In England, King Henry the 8th, whom the pope wouldn’t allow to divorce, married a new wife anyway, and when excommunicated, founded the Church of England. By the mid 16th century, the evangelicals (Lutherans) had spread the Gospel to Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. After armed conflict, the Peace of Augsburg in 1555 allowed both Roman Catholicism and Protestantism to exist in the Holy Roman Empire. Whether a region was to be Catholic or Protestant was usually based on the decision of the local ruler. Only in the “left wing” of the Reformation was there significant protest against governmental involvement. By whatever means, a sweeping Reformation had taken place in amazingly short time.

Doctrine is crucial. Martin Luther once said he would gladly be a Catholic and would even “kiss the pop’s toe “ if the pope would accept and teach “justification by faith alone.” Is the Roman Catholic Church today ready to do this, and, if so, would we, like Luther be ready for reunion? For some people to say “I’m a Protestant” really means, “I’m not a Catholic” (and proud of it!). On the other hand, some pastors and theologians wanted the word “catholic” to appear in the name of the church that eventually became many “ Lutheran Churches”. Some suggested that we are “The Evangelical Catholic Church.” I ask, what are the differences between “Catholicism” and “Protestantism” today? Is there any sense in which we could be called “catholic”? When the Church most needed reform, God provided the means of reform. May the Holy Spirit continue to do so!

God Bless You and This Ministry!

No comments: